Blackpill Leucosticte's prediction finally happened

Leucosticte

Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
830
#4
all high iq posters have been banned. I have a feeling that knaijd is a psychopath.
I actually suspect that cocksucker's reply to the ban appeal was ghostwritten by knajjd. Doesn't it sound more like something knajjd would've written? It could've been copypasted from a Discord discussion or something.
 

IntolerantSocialist

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
381
#5
all high iq posters have been banned. I have a feeling that knaijd is a psychopath.
Ledgemund comes around once in awhile but I don't see him as much. Most of the stormcels were banned because knajjd is a pussy who can't handle banter and deserves to be shoved into a labor camp.
 

Leucosticte

Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
830
#7
Serge writes:
It did. But as it was explained in the appeal, he had over 30 warnings and his 'past deeds' are undeniable, he admits as much. We didn't ban earlier because we gave him chances like we do everyone.
I don't get it; his past deeds were as undeniable a few months ago as they are now. What it comes down to is that Catfishman didn't get on knajjd's shit list three months ago like I did, so he was cut extra slack. If Catfishman had criticized knajjd's moderation, and created a site for Zesto, he probably would've gotten banned earlier too.

Maybe it helps also that Catfishman isn't pro-rape; I dunno.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
34
#8
Serge writes:


I don't get it; his past deeds were as undeniable a few months ago as they are now. What it comes down to is that Catfishman didn't get on knajjd's shit list three months ago like I did, so he was cut extra slack. If Catfishman had criticized knajjd's moderation, and created a site for Zesto, he probably would've gotten banned earlier too.

Maybe it helps also that Catfishman isn't pro-rape; I dunno.
I wondered this as well...I know when they changed policy a few months back in order to more easily get rid of Zyros, (about the time they got rid of you) I didn't understand why they didn't also get rid of Catfishman at the time. If memory serves: the policy change was that you must be indeterminable from true incels, regardless of whether you are one in fact. Specifically, it was the Blackpilled normie (conditional) rule that this modification was intended to apply under. So this modification was retroactively applied to conveniently get rid of a few undesirables/politically inconvenient users.

Of course, there must be some dynamic of backroom politics or arbitrary emotional whim behind the scenes, that primarily determines who gets banned when. Ultimately, newly manufactured rules likely serve as no more than mere convenient excuse after the fact, contrived solely for public relations cover.
 

Leucosticte

Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
830
#9
I wondered this as well...I know when they changed policy a few months back in order to more easily get rid of Zyros, (about the time they got rid of you) I didn't understand why they didn't also get rid of Catfishman at the time. If memory serves: the policy change was that you must be indeterminable from true incels, regardless of whether you are one in fact. Specifically, it was the Blackpilled normie (conditional) rule that this modification was intended to apply under. So this modification was retroactively applied to conveniently get rid of a few undesirables/politically inconvenient users.

Of course, there must be some dynamic of backroom politics or arbitrary emotional whim behind the scenes, that primarily determines who gets banned when. Ultimately, newly manufactured rules likely serve as no more than mere convenient excuse after the fact, contrived solely for public relations cover.
Yeah, you pretty much hit it on the head. By the way, I doubt there's going to be any incel documentary unless there are more mass killings putting incels in the media.
 

Leucosticte

Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
830
#11
A prediction that someone will get banned is probably inevitable.
Pretty much everything can be interpreted as breaking a rule over there. Just responding to a question with "no man" can get you a warning for being low-effort.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
30
#12
Lol what was the reason you got in the PM

I recently got temp banned, here's why I think its happening:
"Too extremist", recently got a temp ban, I got three 20% warnings in a matter of a few days making the same posts I usually do, it seem like an organized effort, so I decided not to go back to the site for 2 months or so, because I expect they are just waiting for me to come back, just so that they can permaban me with the "illusion of fairness", because if they outright just permaban me, it will look bad for them, as many users like my post and know me there.

I'm noticing the site is becoming more like braincels, there's a lot of self censoring going on, and its like the mods are more concerned with the site "not looking bad" than with the site actually functioning as an incel forum, stuff you could say before you can't say now, I was talking about how I would go about doing a rape, and I got my first 20% warning for that, the next one was for a "race bait" thread that was not even a race bait thread, and the final one was for bragging because I said I thought a younger girl maybe liked me because she was young and hadn't been corrupted by society/biology yet, I was in my young teens when that happened, me alleged that a very young girl possibly liked me was bragging.

I'm in no rush to go back, and likely will not go back, except to announce my completely "project"
 

Leucosticte

Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
830
#14
I totaly agree with you. The same thing happened to me, i was to "extreme" or racebaiting. All the high-iq posters have been banned.
It's pretty gay. We get excluded from mainstream society, and then we get excluded from non-mainstream society.
 
Top